Now the basic principles of government houses, enshrined in the Housing code and several regulations, according to the Department. Some of the requirements are not synchronized with each other, and a number of provisions are obsolete. In addition, in the documents there are disadvantages associated with the lack of clear boundaries of responsibility of management companies to the owners and regulatory agencies, with no single view of quality, quantity and cost of services for the management, operation and repair of DSL. In this regard, the Ministry of construction is developing the common rules of management of apartment houses. Their project was already presented to the public in June, in the new version a number of provisions taking into account the wishes of the experts was processed.
have changed the approach to the definition of common property, said Deputy Director of the Department of housing development Ministry of construction Olesya Leshchenko. The project document stipulated that part of the common property is determined by the architectural, functional, and tekhnologicheski, constructive and technical solutions in accordance with project documentation. And this should be taken into account when drawing up the contract management. Because of this, said Leshchenko, will avoid unreasonable exceptions from part of the common property of attics, basements and carriage. On the other hand, will exclude cases of unjustified refusal of owners from maintenance and costs for maintenance of the common property, which became so after the signing of the contract. If, for example, after the repair or improvement changed the composition of the common property, the owners will have to consider it when forming the Board and calculating their costs.
the document specifically stipulates that the management of the building, maintenance, and emergency repairs and restoration, repairs.
Fixed priority of the user manual for the apartment building. If it is, then the list of works, services, their delivery, timing, periodicity is set by the instruction. If no instructions, the list of works chosen from the Annex to the document.
Provides a gradual transition until 2023 to accommodate the technical documentation for the building in the GIS utilities. Because of this should disappear problems with the loss of the technical documentation transmission of the new organization at the change of the management company. If the technical documentation is lost, the owners can make a decision and for a fee to restore it, Leshchenko added.
it is Proposed to document the ability of the management company at the termination of activities to offer to the new person that proceeds to the control building, to conclude a contract of cession for obligations that were not fulfilled. “Maybe she left neisrashodovannoe��th Fund current repair and she wants him to pass – not to transfer back to the owners, and give new management organization – said Leshchenko. – And maybe, on the contrary, she had conducted repair works, but the owners have not yet paid. Not to put debt receipts and not to worry anyone – it is easier to conclude a contract of cession. In practice, it happens, but rarely.”
In the new version of the document added the deadline for the elimination of faults and accidents.
there was a section on the organization of access to common property to third parties. Now there is often a conflict of interest from operators, residents and managers of organizations. Sometimes companies want to advertise homes, to put vending machines. This section will regulate the access of “outsiders”.
Eliminated a previously proposed rule that money for emergency repairs and restoration should be spent only from the special trust Fund. Now offered such a repair should be considered part of maintenance of the common property. Also features emergency repair and maintenance in new buildings.
the New document will address the question of determining the amount of payments. If the owners chose the way of home management, but the Board size does not have agreed rules will be allowed to use the municipal rate. “Practice is widely used today, but never registered. It legalized” – said Leshchenko.
Now the Ministry is ready to send the document to the regulatory impact assessment, anti-corruption examination and submit it to the government.
