“We are committed to working constructively in international forums. But I think we should avoid the word “multilateralism”, in terms of international or multilateral organizations. Words ending in-ISM usually means ideology: fascism, Nazism and communism. Let’s not make of “multilateralism” ideology. The opposite of ideology is another ideology. Opposed to all ideologies – freedom. We’re not talking “svoboden”. We’re talking freedom”, – said the head of the Brazilian foreign Ministry.
Pandemic coronavirus Araujo called the greatest crisis since the Second world war, which can lead to the formation of a new totalitarian system. But stressed that the world and Brazil will not let that happen.
“We will not allow another form of totalitarianism to emerge now, as it emerged after the Second world war (in Eastern Europe – approx. “RG”),” – said Araujo.
the Head of Brazilian diplomacy, is confident that the United Nations, which is three quarters of a century kept the world from a great war, should not be a place of compromise with those countries that call totalitarian: “the UN should not try to find common ground between freedom and totalitarianism, not to mention the fact that secretly the advance of totalitarianism”.
Brazilian diplomacy is currently in a unique position where she was not even in the days of military dictatorship. On the background of following in the Wake of the US foreign policy of the country, moreover, was rapidly losing its independence, it started to work against its own interests. It is openly talked about prominent public figures who are difficult to suspect of ideological bias.
on Friday in the newspaper O Estado de São Paulo has published an open letter authored by former Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso, five former heads of the foreign Ministry of the country, the former Minister of Finance and the environment.
They note that the foreign policy of the country is in a subordinate position to the government of another state. In the letter it is not known, however, on the background of regular statements by the President of Zaire Bolsonaro about the total orientation of its policy in the United States, this is not necessary.
Brazilian diplomacy began to violate the principles of self-determination of peoples, non-interference in the internal Affairs of States and protection of human rights. The authors recall that all of them, like independent foreign policy, enshrined in the Constitution as fundamental.
Over the last fifteen years, Brazil has been able to quarrel with the French and German partners, to leave its citizens living in Venezuela, withdrawing all diplomatic missions from the territory of the sauce��States, and also to get involved in interventionist adventure around it.
In the midst of the crisis surrounding the fashion industry, the Brazilian foreign Ministry proved to be not only useless, but counterproductive, especially in the search for foreign markets for suppliers of medical products and equipment, so necessary for saving lives of thousands of Brazilians.
“Sectarianism unexplained attacks on China and the world health organization, coupled with the disrespect for science and insensitivity towards human life shown by the President, made the government an object of international ridicule and disgust,” reads the letter.
