Cards Against Humanity, known for its humorous adult party game, has filed a lawsuit against SpaceX, accusing the space company of trespassing and damaging their land near the U.S.-Mexico border. The plot of land in Cameron County was purchased by Cards Against Humanity in 2017 as a political statement against former President Donald Trump’s border wall. The company used a supporter-funded campaign, with around 150,000 people contributing $15 each to buy the property.
Since the purchase, Cards Against Humanity claims to have kept the land in its natural state and put up a “No Trespassing” sign around the perimeter. However, they allege that SpaceX has been using the land illegally for the past six months as a parking lot and storage area for their contractors, as well as dumping gravel and debris on the property.
In the lawsuit filed by Cards Against Humanity, they are seeking $15 million in damages from SpaceX and a permanent injunction to prevent further use of the site. Despite reaching out for comment, SpaceX has not responded to the allegations.
Cards Against Humanity has set up a website to bring attention to the lawsuit, highlighting their original intention to criticize politics and now finding themselves in a legal battle with another billionaire, referring to SpaceX’s founder, Elon Musk. The Chicago-based company, known for its controversial and politically incorrect game, describes itself as “a party game for horrible people.”
The lawsuit between Cards Against Humanity and SpaceX sheds light on the complexities of land use and property rights, especially in politically charged areas like the U.S.-Mexico border. It also raises questions about the responsibilities of corporations towards the environment and local communities, as well as the power dynamics between big companies and grassroots movements.
As the legal battle unfolds, it will be interesting to see how the court addresses the competing claims of Cards Against Humanity and SpaceX. The outcome of this case could have broader implications for land use policies and corporate accountability, setting a precedent for future conflicts between private entities and community-driven initiatives.