According to him, it is possible, if the organization before the introduction of holidays acted different regulations on remuneration of labor for workers remotely and in the workplace.
That is, had imposed a regulatory act, which specifies that the work “remote” workers are paid differently. And this document was to act in the organization prior to the issuance of the decree of the President on the subject of non-working days.
however, if the organization does not have such regulations, the salary, working remotely should be retained in full, said the MP.
Andrei Isayev also said that complaints of gross violation of labor rights of the worker and can be sent to the state labour Inspectorate. The latter are entitled to conduct an unscheduled inspection of the organization or employer, and by law she has no right to disclose the name of the one who applies the appropriate complaint.
Also, the citizen has the right to contact the Prosecutor’s office and sue the employer. “If it comes to dismissal, the court will be the most effective structure, – said the representative of “ER.” – After all, if the employer does not agree with the claims of the Union or the state labour Inspectorate, the end point in this dispute will set a court”.
