the Difference in size of pockets in men’s and women’s jeans became the subject of controversy in the network. Relevant discussion on the website Reddit on Wednesday, may 20.
posted by user @udefinitelynottori picture shows man and woman with the same Nintendo console Switch in the front pockets of trousers. It is seen that in the pocket of a male model attachment fits completely while in the women’s — only half.
the Wearer of the portal rebelled described “discrimination” and expressed their displeasure in comments. “This girl was lucky that her jeans have pockets, because in my they do decorative”, “this is What I think constantly! My pockets barely fit a lipstick”, “This is disgusting! I demand equal rights” — said they.
Other users have suggested that pockets on women’s clothes do less for women buying bags. “They just want to earn money by selling handbags and clutches!”, “Oh, you want to take a lot of things? Then buy our expensive bag, because you have no pockets!” — taunted them.
Some commentators, in turn, did not share the opinion of the author of the post. “Oh my God, just buy a bag. In the end, men need to carry more stuff”, “Check the size of your pockets before buying. The problem is solved,” said they.
Two years ago, analysts revealed the advantage of men’s pants over the female. It turned out that the pockets on most women’s pants are much smaller than on the male. Experts compared 80 jeans of the same size, brands such as Calvin Klein, Guess, H&M and Levi’s. According to the study, female models, pockets on average 48 percent less than men.
