Supreme court dismissed Morten Helvegs claim for compensation for violation of the See, and Hear-the case.
Although the Supreme court in march rejected the europaparlamentariker Morten Helveg Petersen (R) claims for reimbursement in the See and Hear the case, then several well-known persons cases with their requirements.
The state attorney Brian Larsen, representing the eight known in See and Hear-the case.
The case of Line Baun Danielsen, Remee, Martin Jørgensen, Iben Hjejle, Casper Christensen, Oliver Bjerrehus, as well as Rigmor Zobel and her husband, Jesper Ravn.
While Morten Helveg Petersen’s case has been dealt with in the Supreme court, has the cases with the other well-known been put on hold.
But despite Helvegs defeat is the plan that the other known maintains their claims, which the district court must take a position.
– Those I have spoken with, would like to continue, ” says Brian Larsen.
Morten Helveg Petersen got like the other known hacked its credit card transactions. In his case, it was forwarded by the so-called hush-hush-source to See and Hear the 10-11 times from June 2008 to september 2009.
See and Hear used one of the information in an article from July 2008, when it appeared that the Mets had been in a certain disco in Berlin.
Brian Larsen believes that his clients are different than the Mets.
– I believe that they are made substantially better to demonstrate that there is talk about the person and defamation of character, he says.
However, he stresses that he also is surprised by the decision of the Supreme court in the case against Morten Helveg.
the Supreme court ruled that even if the Mets had been subjected to “serious unlawful violations of his privacy”, then it should not trigger a replacement.
the Violations were not suitable to “affect his self – and æresfølelse”, it sounded like the court referred to the fact that the transactions did not reveal sensitive personal facts.
– The fundamental problem is, to See and Hear has gotten information, as they can choose between.
– in my view it is that you are given the choice, already a gross violation – just that you have been in to look in the other’s economy should entitle the aggrieved to moral damages, said Brian Larsen.
the Lawyer expects that the cases with the known will be able to come to the court again in the fall.
In the first place had over 20 celebrity raised the claim for reimbursement in the case, but since dropped several of their claims.
– We have cut them from, which had the same krænkelsesniveau as Morten Helveg, ” says Brian Larsen.
The celebrity claim for reimbursement remains to be total of 250,000 crowns for each person.
the Requirements for reimbursement addressed to Aller Media, hush-hush-source as well as the former editor-in-chief, Henrik Qvortrup and Kim Henningsen. It is, however, not all of the well-known, that have raised claims against all four.
/ritzau/
