Roskomnadzor unblocked access to medical Vademecum site after you delete the article about the treatment of patients with coronavirus. But Vademecum intend to defend the case in court — editorial insists that the controversial article was true and based on official documents.Editorial Vademecum notify Roskomnadzor about the removal of the article specified in the request of the Prosecutor General, access to the site resumed, told “Kommersant” the press service of Roskomnadzor. At the time of publication the website is still not available in the networks of individual providers, such as MTS and MegaFon, made sure the “y”.”Well, that is unlocked. But the problem itself hasn’t gone anywhere. Regulator via repression forced us to deactivate absolutely correct authentic material from our site,— said “Kommersant”, chief editor Vademecum Dmitry Kryazhev.— The Prosecutor General’s office still no reason accuses us of spreading false information. We prepare claims to regulators. We cherish the reputation we have earned over the years”.For drawing up legal claims Vademecum attracted lawyers Lidings. “We do not agree with the decision of Roskomnadzor and Prosecutor General’s office and plan to file a lawsuit after the may holidays. This is either a bug, or outrage — false information was not distributed. We will have to go long, we do not expect success in the first and second instance, but maybe we get to the Supreme and constitutional court”,— said Lidings ‘ associate Alexander Popelyuk. “B” pending review from the Prosecutor General.On 22 April on the website of the Vademecum published an article in which, with reference to the letter of the Moscow city mandatory medical insurance Fund, it was reported that medical care provided to patients with coronavirus admitted to the clinic with the ambulance crew is paid. The Prosecutor General’s office acknowledged the article false and appealed to Roskomnadzor with the requirement to take measures to restrict access to it. The Vademecum website was blocked on April 28. The editorial Board complained in an open letter that she was not given the required by law 24 hours after notification of Roskomnadzor to remove the controversial publication and blocked the website before. “According to the provisions of article 15.3 of Federal law No. 149-FZ, according to the requirements of the state office of public Prosecutor measures are taken immediately,” responded the press service of Roskomnadzor.In addition, the editorial Board called the requirement a manifestation of strict censorship under the pretext of public welfare. “The next day after our publication the Moscow Department of health issued a press release which confirmed everything contained in our publication,”— said Dmitry Kryazhev. He also noted that the publication “was a huge number of reprints, including incorrectly quoted different chipofya resources that are not just��irayda in this thread and interpreted the information as they understood it”.Anna Afanasyeva
