According to the verdict was the offended boy invited home to an address in Sarpsborg in may 2019. There he met the two young women, as well as a 15-year-old girl.
the Boy was then 12 years old, while the two women were, respectively, 19 and 17 years old.
After each went to the boy and the two women up in a bedroom. There were three sexual relations.
the Case was discovered two days later when the 15-year-old girl who was in the residence, told his teacher about what had happened. It was the school who reported the matter to the police.
Sentenced to ungdomsstraff
In the verdict against the two women says that the 12-year-old was not subjected to violence, pressure, threats or persuasion. The law defines, however, all sexual intercourse with children under 14 years of age as rape.
the Rape in this case is defined as gross because it was committed by several jointly.
Rough rape of children under the age of 14 has setting also a minimum period of three years in prison. But the younger woman was sentenced to ungdomsstraff because she was under 18 years of age when the relationship happened.
Ungdomsstraff is an option that is juxtaposed with jail time and samfunnsstraff for youth between 15 and 18 years.
If the woman does not see ungdomsstraffen in the course of two years, she must atone parts of the penalty in prison.
– We argued even for ungdomsstraff, and therefore we are pleased with the verdict, says her defender, Kristin Morch.
also Read : Lawyer: – Great strain for the boy Must zone 120 days
The elder of the two women was also found guilty of having filmed the incident and shared the video on to the 15-year-old girl.
In the court concluded the expert with that woman without a doubt was criminally sane.
district attorney Jeanette Westlund Hegna was the prosecutor during the adjudication of the case in the Sarpsborg district court.
Photo: Odd Skjerdal/NRK
After an overall assessment of her evnemessige, social, and emotional disabilities felt right, however, that minstestraffen of three years ‘ imprisonment would be too strict.
She was therefore sentenced to three years in prison, but two years and eight months of the sentence was made conditional. It means that the woman must zone to 120 days in jail.
The remaining time to be extended by three years probation.
– We do not want to comment on the verdict, but can confirm that it will not be appealed, says her defense Anne Grete Bjerketvedt Ludvigsen.
Prosecutor: – Satisfied with the court’s assessment
the Judgment from the Sarpsborg district court was in accordance with the acting attorney general Jeanette Westlund Hegna let down your claim.
– the Prosecution is satisfied with the court’s assessment of the issue of guilt, which is totally in line with how we have considered the matter. The same applies to the assessment of straffespørsmålet, ” she says.
The two women are also ordered to pay the boy 75.000 million in restitution. It is half of what the boy’s lawyer Eline Toverud Antonsen suggested would be the correct total.
– Oppreisningserstatningen is perceived as low. I have no comment to the verdict beyond that, the writing Antonsen to NRK.
