The “crime scene”-a result of 22. March was not received well. The many Sex scenes, and the depicted violence against women in the Swabian-Alemannic Carnival in the black forest, on joined many viewers mad. No wonder has to answer to Roger Blum (75) now, the requirement of a complaint from a spectator. “The crime scene is shown of a woman is discriminatory. The Dignity of the women depicted is repeatedly injured,” said the E-Mail to the SRF of the Ombudsman. “In contrast, the man is represented in such a way that he can treat the woman so. This picture contradicts the constitutional right to equality.” The fact that the “crime scene” was also a “entertainment show”, the cradle of the offense all that much harder.
In the response from Blum to the complaint Nathalie first Jancso, who is in the SRF editorial staff for the foreign produced “crime scene”-consequences responsible position. “We agree with you that the Dignity of the depicted woman is trampled,” writes the TV-woman. “The Film shows but also a Prime example of what is still a sad fact in reality, in spite of the Right to equality: violence against women exists.”
the result was Online only in the Evening callable
you can understand that “I’m in a dream geweinet” some viewers “on Irritation or even rejection” is pushed. “But we want to remember finally, remember that it is not the “crime scene” to a purely fictional program, for which the constitutional requirements such as equal treatment of the sexes in individual cases, are not applicable.” Due to the controversial nature of the episode she was also in the SRF-Online program only in the Evening available.
Also, Blum could not understand that many of the Sex-escapades of the succession to meet every taste. On Twitter Account, the Ombudsman puts it: “It is Chav fucked around. Nevertheless, It is the art of freedom.” In response to the complaint, he will pick up a little more.
“I have many reservations against this “crime scene””
“I react similar to how apparently the average audience: I have many reservations against this “crime scene”,” says Blum. The broadcast by the SRF had been entitled anyway: “A Film is a work of art. In the art, the freedom is immense, and this freedom, too, to paint the moral painting of a rural area in drastic images. The fact of the Film. He was not provocative as some of the theatre performance. Such provocations should be allowed to do the art. Otherwise, you can leave the Theater or the TV off.”
the public morality have not compromised the SRF with the “crime scene”. “This is not a Film that belongs in the realm of Fiction, shows sex scenes, the case,” says Blum. In addition, the Film had been broadcast only in the evening. Blum summarizes: “I can, therefore, in spite of all, understanding for your criticism, your complaint do not support.” (klm)
