A new Texas curriculum for first-grade students aims to engage them with a lesson on Monticello, Thomas Jefferson’s historic estate known for its architecture. However, critics argue that the curriculum glosses over the history of slavery and racism associated with Monticello and fails to provide a comprehensive understanding of America’s past.
The Texas Education Agency proposed the curriculum earlier this year, which includes heavy use of biblical teachings that some say could marginalize non-Christian students and grant the state excessive control over religious education. While the curriculum covers topics like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson’s views on slavery, it omits key details about their ownership of enslaved people.
Parents, academics, and concerned Texans have raised concerns about how the curriculum presents historical figures and events. For example, a lesson on the U.S. Civil War focuses on Robert E. Lee’s leadership without acknowledging his views on race, and a lesson on Martin Luther King Jr. highlights his nonviolent advocacy while omitting his critiques of racial injustice.
The curriculum also faces criticism for its portrayal of World War II and the Holocaust, which are presented in detail, while downplaying the race-based nature of slavery in America. The Texas Education Agency defends its choices, stating that the content is age-appropriate and suitable for elementary school students.
Historians and educators emphasize the importance of teaching a comprehensive and accurate history to students, including the realities of slavery and racism in America. They argue that lessons should not shy away from difficult topics but should provide a nuanced understanding of the country’s past.
Some critics of the curriculum worry that it perpetuates a whitewashed version of history that fails to prepare students for civic engagement and critical thinking. They call for a more balanced approach that acknowledges the complexities and contradictions in America’s history.
As the State Board of Education considers the approval of the curriculum, public education advocates continue to voice their concerns and push for revisions that provide a more inclusive and accurate portrayal of American history. Parents stress the importance of ensuring that children see themselves reflected accurately in the curriculum and have the tools to think critically about the world around them.
