In just 15 days, Robert Roberson, a 57-year-old man with autism, is set to be executed in Texas for a crime that a bipartisan majority of Texas House lawmakers believe never happened. Back in 2003, Roberson was convicted of killing his daughter Nikki based on the now-discredited “shaken baby syndrome” theory.
When Roberson took Nikki to the hospital because of a high fever and pneumonia, doctors suspected foul play due to her condition and Roberson’s behavior. Despite his autism, Roberson’s lawyer argues that his unusual demeanor was due to his condition, not guilt.
The medical evidence presented in Roberson’s case indicates that Nikki’s death was caused by severe illness, an accidental fall, and medical negligence rather than abuse. Additionally, the use of “shaken baby syndrome” as the basis for Roberson’s conviction has been widely discredited.
In a last-ditch effort to save Roberson’s life, a bipartisan group of lawmakers visited him in prison and are urging the Court of Criminal Appeals and Governor Greg Abbott to show mercy. Roberson has filed a petition for clemency based on new evidence and inconsistencies in his trial.
This is not the first time Roberson has faced the threat of execution. In 2016, his execution was stayed just one week before the scheduled date, and subsequent legal proceedings have failed to overturn his conviction.
As the clock ticks down to October 17, the date of Roberson’s scheduled execution, his legal team is racing against time to secure clemency or a reprieve. The case has raised serious questions about the use of flawed scientific theories in criminal convictions and the importance of ensuring justice is served.
The outcome of Roberson’s case will not only determine his fate but also have far-reaching implications for the integrity of the criminal justice system in Texas. It is up to Governor Abbott and the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles to consider the new evidence and make a decision that upholds justice and fairness.
The fight for Robert Roberson’s life is a stark reminder of the flaws and injustices that can occur within the legal system, especially when outdated or discredited scientific theories are used as evidence. The public outcry and bipartisan support for Roberson’s clemency highlight the need for a thorough review of his case and a commitment to ensuring that justice is served.
