I’m talking about the legal act that determines disputes around the question of how do this very office to provide a current or former serviceman and his family shelter or “housing” money, or if a military retiree already owns the land and some small construction on it.
Previously, this situation was treated in the army is clear: once a person or a family member have a property, then other housing or subsidy he did not put .
And a soldier or a military retiree was excluded from the waiting list to receive from agencies apartments or housing subsidies.
With the introduction of amendments to article 56 of the Housing code of the Russian Federation and adjustment of the articles 15 and 24 of the Federal law “On status of servicemen”, the situation changes radically. Now the army of the waiting list, homeless military pensioners and members of their families even if they have land plots intended for the construction of the house, it is forbidden to delete from the list in need of residential premises. Such lists, the recall is underway in each military unit and institution.
moreover, today Federal law clearly explained: if a man like this has happened and he is seeking a return to departmental home of all responsible officials prescribes to do so.
Strictly speaking, this problem is not only very painful for the servicemen but also of chronic. About it the correspondent “RG” told the head of the Department of housing of the military Department Sergey Pies.
Here’s how he described the situation. “Defense Ministry proposes to change the housing legislation, to be inherited by family members of a soldier’s estate did not rule out the possibility of obtaining funds from the Ministry of defence. And that’s how it happens, the wife of an officer inherited from his parents old country house of 100 square meters. Is this house in the country, on the verge of collapse. And according to the documents is available in family housing size, non-payment of subsidies. This, of course, unfair,” said the military official.
the Leadership of the defense Department consistently and firmly defended his position. And made your point.
