In Britain, to the completion of a suitable trial, in which both parties are both accusers and accused. This is a case involving the Hollywood actors johnny Depp and his ex-wife amber heard, as well as major British newspaper the Sun, over a story which began the process. Journalists claimed that Depp “beat” and “systematically bullied” over his ex-wife. Then the artist sued for libel and the newspaper, and heard. He hopes to clear his good name and prove to the world – in this story he is the victim, not the perpetrator.
johnny Depp lynched. It was two years ago when his ex-wife amber heard in a divorce accused him of domestic violence, alcoholism, drug addiction, and even showed signs of beatings.
the Reason for all this was simple: Depp did not want to pay Hurd a huge amount of money that the actress expected after the break with a rich artist.
However, all of these statements were sufficient to Depp naturally destroyed.
Remember such a stupid thing as the presumption of innocence? This has long since become a pathetic relic of the past, especially for the progressive part of America.
Now “we just have to believe the victim”, especially if the victim is a woman who claims that her violent man. In such a situation the presumption of guilt, where nothing can save the unfortunate “fair” (even better to say “socially equitable”) for retribution.
did Not help in this situation, any evidence of other women who dated Depp – the words of Winona Ryder, Kate moss and Vanessa Paradis weigh less than the charges heard. This makes sense, because they are witnesses, not “victims” and because they do not “believe”.
Not helped by the fact that those “irrefutable evidence” in the form of bruises were fake and had nothing to Depp no relation. These beatings were not, then some other had. The victim must believe, remember?
only when the network began to appear numerous recordings that heard directly tells the psychologist how she beats up the wife and mocking him, he heard a timid voice that maybe johnny Depp too, deserved a little justice. Bold idea, but ill-fated audio continued to pour and difficult to administer gender-certain retribution for all victims of domestic violence one particular johnny Depp.
as a result of the process which started with the fact that johnny has taken everything from favorite captain Jack Sparrow (the role for which he changed healthy teeth for gold!) ending his good name, has turned into a serious trial.
When it came to a real court, it suddenly turned out that in addition to social justice and Prez��of mpcii guilt there are still some concrete evidence, evidence and evidence that is necessary to provide. And provide turned out to be nothing special.
all the witnesses from amber heard there was only one woman who under oath was prepared to testify that johnny Depp beat wife. This is Kyo’s younger sister Whitney Enriquez. With this also came an embarrassing incident – it was found that in the past amber was used violence to Whitney, and whether the actress man, she would be in trouble, but luckily, amber heard a woman, because it was forgotten – just sisterly squabbles. Moreover, the nurse mad at amber heard does not hold: she too was a victim of violence by johnny Depp.
According to the sister of the actress, Depp wanted to throw her down the stairs, and only the intervention of amber saved her. Then the artist began to beat his wife, and she gave him a response.
In General, such evidence seem to put it mildly, unreliable. Here can be considered everything from the relationship between the witness and “victim” to her own interest. Even more sad that Whitney Enriquez was the only witness who confirmed the words heard.
Not helped by the publication The Sun. In the beginning of the proceedings, the journalists of the British tabloyd promised to publish the “overwhelming evidence” of guilt Depp. However, for some reason they are limited to the retelling of the words of amber heard and a couple of loud statements.
a representative of the interests of the publication Sasha wass was bright and eloquent. “After hearing all the evidence in this case and all supporting violence, we assume that there is no doubt that Mr. Depp regularly and systematically abused his wife. The fact that he beat his wife – absolutely true characteristic lifestyle Depp, surrounded by a clique of aging men-instigators with drugs and alcohol is destroying his life, his career and his health,” said wass.
And all this, of course, it sounds nice, that’s just where did those “irrefutable evidence”? Apparently for the personal collection of them saved, not otherwise.
At the same time, evidence from Depp was not just a lot, a lot. This friends of the artist who from the very beginning to the detriment of themselves testified to his innocence. They were joined by former partner Depp. But all the words are overshadowed by audio and video evidence, with the details recorded as amber heard mocked the husband: from a severed piece of finger, ending with the feces in his bed. And here the evidence is already easy to block.
Depp’s Lawyer David Sherborne has particularly drawn attention to the fact that domestic violence in this family were, except that his victim was johnny Depp. He recalled that one of the video Hurd did “a direct, unambiguous and unequivocal recognition strike” Depp.
“Her physical violence towards him, her initiative in the violence, which she admits makes her home perpetrator and not,” said Sherborne.
it Seems that in the history johnny Depp will all end with a happy ending. And I would like – without any bias to amber heard in the proceedings before the court, she lost, and lost big. Left to it was recorded by the court, who promised to reach a verdict after some time.
However, the problem is that johnny Depp is not the only man lynched simply for the fact that there was someone willing to groundlessly accuse him of violence. Examples of so much that does not even make sense to list them: the careers of a huge number of people have been forever broken by this most horrible principle – “we must believe the victim.”
it is the root of all evil. Victim, like the accused, only human, and her words – just words of one of the parties, regardless of gender, age and race. And so the victim does not need to believe. As well as the accused not to be believed. You need to believe evidence otherwise sad story johnny Depp will be repeated again and again.
And domestic violence need to fight – it affects thousands of people, men and women. He suffered from johnny Depp. But things become clear only after a normal trial, not after the lynching on the basis of progressivists ideas.
Read also: “put a cigarette Out on the face”: new details of the trial of johnny Depp”
