The organization of project activities in the government changes — the White house issued a decree with new rules management system projects. In the new version of the design of the work the government is already close to the practice of managing large corporate structure. The new scheme looks lighter than the previous and more flexible. The most important changes — the greater independence of Federal projects, the new scheme of assessment of performance of national projects, including alternative. We offer you the next step to build the equivalent of ERP-system for the Federal public administration on the basis of the Ministry of Finance and the government apparatus. There is also the extension projects of the powers of top managers, at all levels, including the Prime Minister, and change the actual role of the economy not only in the design of the work, but in the government as a whole.The government published a new version of resolution No. 1288, dated 31 October 2018, defines the project activities to the government. Recall that the experiments on the division of the White house project (organized in similar project activities in commercial companies — implementation of a unique and ultimate goals of the projects) and process (implementing regular processes) activities started in 2014-2015, and the last government of Dmitry Medvedev (may 2018 — January 2020) of the project activities have already been identified.A new scheme started to cook at the White house on behalf of the President dated 4 January, the team of new Prime Minister Mikhail mishustina for five months of work was included in part of the changes associated with the new design of government and practices in administrative work. A scheme was prepared for introduction in limited time periods (up to the active phase of the budget process for the years 2021-2023), the bulk of the work fell on the reform of project activities in the government (Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Grigorenko) and the financial-economic bloc (first Deputy Prime Minister Andrei Belousov), the main changes proposed in the functional structure and due to the fact that the design of the activities of the White house is not isolated from the process, the new scheme will affect the operation of government in General.So, they can be implemented outside the projects. New FP can be initiated by a government Minister, its President, Council for national projects, if the project measurable impact on the achievement of “national development” in the relevant decree of the President. NP, supervised by Deputy Prime Ministers, are in this aspect, the set of FP, between which, in furtherance of NP can be redistributed resources. In the new scheme, the powers of the Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Ministers and Ministers for offset��of reconstruction of NP and OP extended, the number of administrative procedures that are needed for current changes is reduced, the scheme now seems to be more flexible and allow faster changes than previously. In this sense, it has become even more resemble the standard project management practice of a public JSC and functional roles of participants in the process — this has both positive and problematic sides. In the new scheme, less emphasis on “personal responsibility” gosmenedzhment of NP and OP (although it is saved), and more importance is given to the communication scheme for the project.Changed in the same manner and principles of the control over execution of the NP and especially the OP. In the new scheme the functions of informsystems, responsible for resource allocation, financial transactions and management decisions, cannot be considered to be fully matched in the analogue ERP-systems used in public JSC, but to make the next step in this direction. Within the SAS “Administration” is created subsystem to automatically collect information about managing NP (and OP), which is synchronized with the “Electronic budget” Treasury, Ministry of Finance, the project also involved Minifra, and these data can be used “automatically” — as a fact, without someone’s approval. In this part of independence is important the origin of the information about what in reality happens in the processes that make up the project, at the same time, we will remind, at the level of NP purposes is appropriate, or Rosstat statistics, or metrics according to the techniques of international organizations. Note that in the new scheme “legalised” alternative indicators. Finally a fully coordinated control system of NP and OP in the White house will appear by the summer of 2021. By this time, apparently, will change and some management practices in the government, the part related to project activities, changes already — for example, some meetings of the working structures of the project can be held in absentia-electronic form, that is actually in the form of voting in the digital environment.Changes the function of the analytical center (AC) of the government — he’s completely focused on work on creating a “госERP”. In turn, part of the long-cancelled features of ATS, created in parallel with the structures of “Open government”, in distributed form is sent to public-expert councils under the NP and not within them OP. Finally, at the project office of the Federal government created a center of expertise project activity, its precise function from the decision of the White house is not obvious, apparently it is an internal methodological and independent control of the government apparatus in the system NP.Despite the fact that what is happening looks very special and important only to the participants of the process, the reform project activities, especially in connection with shared SOS��oasiria and impending changes in administrative practices at the White house, a process which significantly change how the Federal government works, what tasks and the speed with which it can discuss and decide. Corporate culture in the administrative environment in Russia, which emerged in the 1990s — early 2000s, as a rule, able to effectively resist any changes to the rules of the game from the outside, obessmyslivaet all the “revolutionary” appointments, but are very sensitive to changes in the environment in which it exists. In this case what is happening is an attempt to move it towards a more digital environment in which many looking the invariant properties of the system can be transformed in a few months. These processes, as, for example, civil service reform in 2003-2005, or the digitalization of the Treasury in recent years, poorly perceived by the public, despite a significant impact on the condition of the state apparatus.Dmitry Butrin
