Modifying the bill on the national audit office to the second reading, the economy Ministry has practically rewritten it. Among the most significant changes in the rejection of the idea of control and supervising production, as well as the stricter approach to non-state forms of control. Now, excluded the possibility of release from Supervisory activities at insurance of risks of harm, as requested by the deputies, however, this time the objections come from the business.The Ministry of economy has finalized the second reading of the bill on the national audit office (the latest version is at “b”), almost completely copying it and reducing. We will remind, the project is conceived as one of the key documents of the reform of control and Supervisory activities (KND) — it should be a kind of procedural code. This document in tandem with the project on the mandatory requirements (the”material” part of the reform) in April, passed the first reading (see “Kommersant” on 20 April).The main idea of the project remains the same — the transition from a punitive to a preventive and risk based approaches. The most radical change will be more understanding of the process KND — initially, the project was set that all activities (except for emergency) can only be conducted after the opening of the control and supervising of production, described in a separate Chapter. Now this Chapter is excluded, the regulation mainly affects the event. Changed the list of preventive measures, because it struck recommendations and issue guidelines on compliance and preventive maintenance, the list was closed: awareness, practice, incentives, integrity, caution, counseling, self-examination, preventive visit.Stricter approach to non-state forms of control. Previously it was assumed that the law may provide for cases of replacement of state control with control of self-regulatory organizations against their members — now they must be enclosed with gecontroleerde agreement.Finally, from the project excluded the possibility of exemption from the control of the companies who have insured the risks of harm — now this is only a Testament to their integrity. Initially, this provision was criticized by the deputies (see “Kommersant” on January 17), and with the exception of this rule do not agree already business. “In many cases, it is possible to replace the control and Supervisory activities at insurance of risks”,— told “Kommersant” Vice-President “Support of Russia” Vladislav Korochkin. As an example he cites the case of Norilsk Nickel, which might not be the case for insurance risks. “Insurers are not interested in loss and carefully check the objects”,— said Mr. Korochkin.For last month it already the second version�� amendments to the basic law of the reform of the CPV. First we were criticised by the government office on 8 June, in particular, due to unrecorded observations of the Ministry and business associations, and the project was again modified. So, the Ministry of justice pointed out that it is not taken into account the requirements for separation of powers of the supervisors, it was unclear whether the effect of the project on the control of state authorities and officials. Simultaneously project differently regulated control measures without the controlled entity, and the rules on recovery of damages from the controlling bodies in case of illegal actions and demanded clarification of the relationship of losses and violations of supervisors. Yesterday the justice Ministry, “Kommersant” explained that these comments were taken into account.Evgenia Kryuchkova, Diana Galieva
