Recall that the simplified procedure provides for determining on the basis of photo and video recordings in relation to the drivers and owners of cars. “Letters of happiness” is the result of this simplified procedure.
the new draft administrative code in article 2.12 stipulates that the transport owners were prosecuted for violating traffic rules in case they have been fixed operating in automatic mode special technical means. That is, not just an abstract means of fotovideofiksatsiey, special and technical, which have been approved as a means of measurement. In this case stipulates that the requirements for them, as well as their placement, use and designation, are established by the government. Recall now that the draft amendments to the rules of the road, which just introduced a sign indicating the camera on the roads, as well as requirements for placement.
the new draft Cao is a possibility to make orders under the simplified procedure, if the violation recorded in any applications. Except for one specialized software, which is included in the portal, or integrated with it. In fact, we are talking about the application “public inspector”, which with the filing of the interior Ministry develops the Ministry of communications.
If the project is accepted in this form, applications that are now used for issuing fines against motorists in Moscow, Moscow region and Tatarstan will be outlawed.
But even the “people’s inspector”, which should purchase all-Russian value all the same problems. In the prescribed wording in the code to use it will only pedestrians to identify violators of Parking rules, as well as land improvement, i.e. Parking on lawns. For drivers the opportunity to send recorded video violation other driver impossible. After all, the car DVR is not integrious in public Services. According to experts, the mechanism of the struggle of pedestrians and motorists. Perhaps even for personal, selfish interests.
In the new version of the administrative code stipulates the presumption of innocence. In the previous version it was not. The Ministry of justice explained that the presumption of innocence prescribed in the draft Procedural code of administrative offences, but in connection with the importance of this issue, it was prescribed in the administrative code. But what will conclude the presumption of innocence for car owners whose violations are revealed with the help of photo and video recordings, find out when public comment will re-post the draft Procedure of the administrative code. In the previous version it was spelt the same way as in the current Code. Resulting in ambiguous interpretation motorists are often themselves had toshows his innocence in a particular violation.
